Summary: | [Chameleon - AutoDoc/Core] New maturity levels "TR" and "PR" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Chameleon | Reporter: | Chris Thorne <cthorne@dmsolutions.ca> |
Component: | Core | Assignee: | chameleon-dev <chameleon-dev@lists.maptools.org> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P2 | ||
Version: | 1.99 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Hardware: | PC | ||
OS: | Windows 2000 | ||
Whiteboard: |
from a technical point of view, there is no differentiation between two different release categories and I don't see this as being a value that would make a difference to the end user of the widgets (i.e. they are unlikely to see a difference betweeen minimum maturity levels of RT and RP. But I will add these to the code base anyway. Leaving to Bill to determine if there are any complications in the doc builder. New maturity levels are: MATURITY_TECHNICALRELEASE MATURITY_PRODUCTRELEASE
While the technical distinction between the two levels is not great, I still think there is some. Some users might be more comfortable using a widget if it is included in documents like a tutorial and/or users guide. As well, with even fewer known bugs in PR than in TR, that also might be of help to the user. I agree that the largest "gain" from this distinction is an internal one, I'd still like to make this distinction at this point.
No problems for the doc_builder...updating now.
Fixed in CVS.