Bug 740 - [Chameleon - AutoDoc/Core] New maturity levels "TR" and "PR"
: [Chameleon - AutoDoc/Core] New maturity levels "TR" and "PR"
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
: Chameleon
Core
: 1.99
: PC Windows 2000
: P2 normal
: ---
Assigned To:
:
:
:
:
:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-10-19 12:34 by
Modified: 2004-10-20 12:07 (History)


Attachments


Note

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Description From 2004-10-19 12:34:11
Darren's following request:
Hi Chris:

While I was reviewing your maturity level tables I realized that we needed to
split the 
*R* category 

R (release) - out of development, no known bugs, thoroughly tested, completely
documented 

into two new categories:

RT (Release - technology) - out of development, few known bugs (all minor),
thoroughly 
tested, widget doc completed

RP (Release - product) - out of development, no known bugs, thoroughly tested, all 
documentation completed

This will account for the differences in the documentation and bug management
between a 
1.99 release and a 2.0 release, for example. 
--------------------------

From the maturity level xml schema, it is a one second fix. But I realizing that
this changes a few things. I have the follow question that need to be consider
before this bug is resolved:

1) Is there any complications to the maturity level code in Chameleon?
2) Is there any complications to the maturity level code in Doc Builder?

If no to both questions than this bug can close.
------- Comment #1 From 2004-10-20 08:49:03 -------
from a technical point of view, there is no differentiation between two
different release categories and I don't see this as being a value that would
make a difference to the end user of the widgets (i.e. they are unlikely to see
a difference betweeen minimum maturity levels of RT and RP.

But I will add these to the code base anyway.  Leaving to Bill to determine if
there are any complications in the doc builder.

New maturity levels are:

MATURITY_TECHNICALRELEASE
MATURITY_PRODUCTRELEASE
------- Comment #2 From 2004-10-20 09:04:55 -------
While the technical distinction between the two levels is not great, I still 
think there is some. Some users might be more comfortable using a widget if it 
is included in documents like a tutorial and/or users guide. As well, with even 
fewer known bugs in PR than in TR, that also might be of help to the user. 

I agree that the largest "gain" from this distinction is an internal one, I'd 
still like to make this distinction at this point. 
------- Comment #3 From 2004-10-20 10:40:02 -------
No problems for the doc_builder...updating now.
------- Comment #4 From 2004-10-20 12:07:33 -------
Fixed in CVS.