Bug 806 - [Chameleon - Doc builder] Keymap missing IMAGE attribute during processing
: [Chameleon - Doc builder] Keymap missing IMAGE attribute during processing
Status: NEW
: Chameleon
AutoDoc
: 1.99
: PC Windows 2000
: P2 normal
: FUTURE
Assigned To:
:
: Need Design Decision - 20041103
:
:
:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2004-10-29 16:56 by
Modified: 2004-11-05 14:12 (History)


Attachments


Note

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.


Description From 2004-10-29 16:56:02
the output from doc_builder for Keymap it has been confirmed that it seems to
skip the IMAGE attribute. It is not added to the attribute list.
------- Comment #1 From 2004-10-29 21:31:24 -------
Changed target to 1.99 RC 1.
------- Comment #2 From 2004-11-01 20:10:28 -------
I just checked the code, the IMAGE attribute is correctly registered.  Perhaps
this has something to do with the code that tests to see if a widget is in the
button group?
------- Comment #3 From 2004-11-01 21:26:02 -------
Paul, I was thinking this was the problem, but I did not have the confidence to
staight this. Instead I filed a bug about renameing the IMAGE attribute (bug
807). You rejected this idea. In the context of this bug it seemed an easier and
realistic request to rename an attribute, vs. trying to find another what
identify an attribute found in the attribute group and within the widget. 
------- Comment #4 From 2004-11-01 21:38:34 -------
actually I forgot that I filed bug 805 that states that for some reason the
button group is being registered for the keymap widget.

In the context of this bug it makes sense why IMAGE is not listed with the
attributes.

only Navtool and base attribute groups should be listed in the include section
of the xml doc.
------- Comment #5 From 2004-11-05 13:59:21 -------
Assign to bill
------- Comment #6 From 2004-11-05 14:12:17 -------
Eventhough this bug needs furthur Design Decisions within the context of
Chameleon.

The issue for this attribute still exists. when the xml doc is being processed
for this widget this attribute will be removed.

I would like bill to give suggestions for this issue, before proceding.