|
| Summary: | Not all <img> tags have the required ALT attribute | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Chameleon | Reporter: | Bart van den Eijnden <bartvde@osgis.nl> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | chameleon-dev <chameleon-dev@lists.maptools.org> |
| Status: | NEW | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P2 | ||
| Version: | 1.99 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
how important is 'valid html'? Is there a browser that this causes problems with? I have no problem with fixing this (in general) but I am not keen on undertaking this unless there is a pressing need for it. Otherwise it will happen slowly over time I guess. But if you want to do it ... :) ... fill your boots ... I just did a quick search, there are 68 occurances of <img in chameleon/htdocs (including php_utils/src), not all of which would require changing ... so it is not a monumental task. Note that Button.php does add an alt tag so it would only be widgets that use images directly that would be a concern (mainly in popups I guess).
Bart, if this is important to you, I would suggest that you start adding the alt tags as you run across them missing. I'll do the same. We'll do a review in a couple of months and see if we've got them all.
Okay, good idea, will do so.